i expect my users to know enough to be able to use the .dll files without further instructions
That's somewhat like overestimating users. Instructions should be delivered as well as the sources. You can't say "he knows for sure what he needs to install this file". If you're talking to a complete newbie, he could even mess with the Operating System. If you think that a new Stulle user, total newbie that can't even turn on a PC, knows how to install a .dll, you may be wrong. Installation instructions should always be provided, regardless of the user's knowledge or the GPL. So, we're including an INSTALL file, always. I know it's not mandatory, but it's like an invitation. You wanna read? Fine.
You don't? Fine as well.
If you, user, know your foe and can install a Windows OS blind-folded, you're smart and can throw the INSTALL file straight to /dev/null. We're fine with that.
If you can't take a mouse in hand, you're not, and need to be guided on the installation.
when i released the translation of scarangel 2.5 i was asked why i removed the files you added. i told cellax i did it because there is no need to keep them...
Wasn't that for the Stulle 6.0?
i am not fine with you guys simply skipping me as the project administrator.
Then, if you're the project admin, you should say simply a "yes" or a "no".
And, we will act accordingly.